Tavere

Free Case Evaluation

510-255-4646
  • Home
  • About Firm
  • Practice Areas
  • Testimonials
  • Attorney
  • Blog
    • Articles
    • Chapter 7 Bankruptcy
    • Chapter 13 Bankruptcy
    • General Bankruptcy
    • Bankruptcy Law
    • Bankruptcy News
    • Types of Debt in Bankruptcy
  • Contact Us
Stop Worrying About Your Debt

A Better Tomorrow

Starting Today

Stop Worrying About your Debt.
Call us Now to Take the First Step.

Click Here
Affordable Payment Plans

Free Consultations

Affordable Fees

Affordable Payment Plans.
Free 1 Hour Consultations.

Click Here

Get Back

On Track

Wipe out your Debt and Pave The
way to a Better Financial Future

Click Here
Millions in debt discharged for our clients

Real concern

Real help

Millions in debt Discharged
For our Clients. Call Today, let us Help!

Click Here

9th Circuit Allows an Employee to Pursue Discrimination Action, Even Without Listing it in Her Bankruptcy

wpadmin on August 14, 2013 Posted in Bankruptcy Law

papersIn a noteworthy departure from the rulings of other federal circuit courts, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals gave a county employee the green light to sue her employer for discrimination, even though she originally failed to disclose the lawsuit in her Chapter 7 bankruptcy filing. The court concluded that, in situations where a debtor filed the correct documents to reopen her bankruptcy and correct the error, as the debtor in Quin v. County of Kauai Dep’t of Transp. did, the trial court should not presume that the original failure to disclose was motivated by deceit, but rather analyze the facts under the “commonly understood” definitions of “mistaken” and “inadvertent”.

The issue in Ms. Ah Quin’s case involved a pair of court cases she filed. In the first, she sued her employer, the Kauai County Department of Transportation, for sex discrimination late in 2008. While that case proceeded, the woman also filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy protection in the spring of 2009. The debtor answered “none” in the bankruptcy schedule question inquiring about pending lawsuits. The woman also did not mention the lawsuit at the bankruptcy hearing about her assets. The court issued an order of discharge and closed the bankruptcy in September 2009. Four months later, as the county began taking steps to dismiss the discrimination action because of the non-disclosure, the debtor requested to reopen the bankruptcy and listed the suit. Quin claimed that she misunderstood what her disclosure obligations were in the bankruptcy filing.

The trial court dismissed the discrimination suit, but the 9th Circuit reversed that ruling. In general, if a debtor does not disclose a lawsuit and then obtains a bankruptcy discharge, then the doctrine of judicial estoppel says that the debtor cannot pursue her civil action. Other circuit courts have ruled that if debtors knew about their civil cases, and have potential motives to hide that information, then judicial estoppel applied and defeated their civil claims. The 9th Circuit, though, reasoned that this was too narrow of a standard. Instead, lower courts should analyze whether the debtor made a legitimate error or inadvertent oversight, using the common meanings of “mistaken” or “inadvertent.”

Quin had several facts in her favor, according to the 9th Circuit. First, she had reopened the bankruptcy and disclosed the lawsuit. The need for full disclosure in bankruptcy cases is essential, but the debtor met that standard by submitting her amended filing. Additionally, she did not receive any advantage by her non-disclosure. If a debtor obtains an unfair advantage in her civil suit as a result of failing to disclose in bankruptcy, then judicial estoppel would likely apply.

The 9th Circuit acknowledged its break from the other circuits, but concluded that giving debtors broader leeway in these situations was appropriate, because to do otherwise would give alleged bad actors, like the employer in Quin’s case, a “free pass” from its purported misconduct based on a technicality unrelated to its case.

Although the debtor’s civil case, in this circumstance, survived, her near-loss of her right to sue for discrimination serves as a powerful warning to debtors to ensure that they thoroughly understand the requirements of the bankruptcy filings they submit, or retain competent counsel who does.

The Law Offices of Melanie Tavare is a debt relief agency. We help people file for bankruptcy relief under the Bankruptcy Code

Recent Posts

  • Sears Files Chapter 11

    Corporate bankruptcies are somewhat misunderstood. While Chapter 11 bankruptcy is called a reorganization, the idea that a business will em

    category : Bankruptcy Law, Blog

  • Wasting Assets

    When a business faces bankruptcy, questions arise regarding how to handle wasting assets. In general, a business may operate per its regula

    category : Bankruptcy Law, Blog

  • Chapter 11 Negotiation

    Chapter 11 bankruptcy is a negotiation. As a result, it is imperative to consider strategies that keep your business alive during and after

    category : Bankruptcy Law, Blog

  • DIP Financing

    The United States Bankruptcy Code, or the Code, provides a variety of chapters wherein a distressed debtor can file. Debtors are afforded a

    category : Bankruptcy Law, Blog

search this year

  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • Search by Year

  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • img

    Quick Links

    • Home
    • About Firm
    • Practice Areas
    • Attorney
    • Communities Served
    • FAQ
    • Disclaimer
    • Contact Us

    Follow Us

    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Google
    • Yelp

    Contact Us

    • Oakland Office

      1300 Clay St. Suite 600
      Oakland, CA 94612

    • Hayward Office

      225 W Winton Ave,
      Ste 111
      Hayward, CA 94544

    • 510 255 4646

    We serve the following localities: Alameda County, Alameda, Berkeley, Castro Valley, Fremont, Hayward, Livermore, Oakland, San Leandro, Union City, Contra Costa County, Antioch, Brentwood, Concord, Martinez, Pittsburg, Richmond, Walnut Creek, San Francisco County, San Francisco, Albany, Ashland, Dublin, Emeryville, Newark, Pleasanton, San Lorenzo, and Alamo.


    The Law Offices of Melanie Tavare is a debt relief agency. We help people file for bankruptcy relief under the Bankruptcy Code


    San Leandro Bankruptcy Attorney Melanie Tavare Home | Contact Hayward Foreclosure Defense Lawyer Melanie Tavare

    2018 © Copyright law office of Melanie Tavare